Each question links to a short video of the response.

1. Would you explain who you are and what your background is?

2. Is there a health risk due to exposure to the electromagnetic energy from 5G towers?

3. How dangerous to health is exposure to man-made electromagnetic energy?

4. In your opinion, exposure to 5G cellphone towers causes increased risks for what disease?

5. Why do you say that exposure to 5G cellphone tower energy is a form of involuntary human experimentation?

6. Why aren’t physicists able to predict the health effects of electromagnetic energy?

7. Is the concept of a linear dose-response applicable to the biological effects of electromagnetic energy?

8. Can the laws of physics be used to prove that exposure to 5G energy will be safe?

9. In relation to how the brain works, what does it mean to say the brain is “nonlinear?”

10. Is the pulse structure of a cellphone signal a significant factor in assessing the effects of the energy?

11. Do some pulse structures of cellphone signals cause greater health risks than another pulse structures?

12. Is the frequency of the electromagnetic energy a critical concept when evaluating the health risks of the energy?

13. Is the industry position that there are no known risks of exposure to electromagnetic energy a matter of willful ignorance?

14. Do you think that the industry experts are honestly interested in protecting the public?

15. What is your opinion of Rodney Croft’s assertion that cellphones are safe?

16. What procedure should be followed to get at the best answer to the question of health risks?

17. Why did you say that Croft was the Trump of Australia?

18. Can you provide the three top questions to ask an industry expert?

19. What is your opinion of the reliability of the advice given by ICNIRP and by other blue-ribbon panels?

20. Do you think the model used by ICNIRP to set safety standards is valid?

21. How do you think the industry controls expert panels like ICNIRP?

22. Do you think it’s a wise strategy to try to show the commission that the electromagnetic energy from the 5G towers is unsafe?

23. What kind of evidence should the Australian Commission consider in deciding whether the G5 cellphone signal is safe?

24. What decision do you think the Commission should make?

25. How could the Commission explain a decision of that kind to the public?

26. What do you mean when you characterize government officials who evaluate health risks from cellphones as referees of a fight between David and Goliath?