The prohibition is against involuntary human experimentation, not against human experimentation in general. If it were the case, for example, that the pertinent research funded by the Electric Power Research Institute were honestly done and openly disclosed, then the members of the public who chose to do so could assess their risks and make whatever decision regarding exposure seemed best. On the other hand, exposure is effectively involuntary when it comes about as a result of fraud or deceit regarding the possible adverse consequences, which I think is now the case. It is not the EMF exposure that should be prohibited, but rather its involuntariness.